89

 

Lesson 2

Outcomes:

  1. Describe how to inventory and assess the condition of your assets
  2. Explain the concept of Levels of Service
  3. Discuss the impact of levels of funding on Level of Service

Asset Inventory Management

 

Inventorying and assessing the condition of assets is an integral part of effective asset management. A comprehensive inventory provides a clear picture of what assets are owned, where they are located, and their current condition. This information enables organizations to make informed decisions regarding maintenance, replacement, and future investments. Here’s a step-by-step guide to inventory and assess the condition of assets:

1. Define the Scope:
  • Determine which assets you need to inventory and assess. This could range from all assets in an organization to specific categories like IT assets, infrastructure, or machinery.
2. Gather Existing Data:
  • Check existing records, databases, and systems to gather preliminary data on assets. This might include purchase records, warranties, previous assessment reports, etc.
3. Choose or Develop an Asset Management Tool:
  • For smaller organizations, a simple spreadsheet may suffice.
  • Larger entities or those with complex assets might benefit from specialized asset management software which can integrate with other organizational systems and provide advanced analytics.
4. Physical Inventory:
  • Conduct a physical walkthrough to list all assets.
  • For each asset, record essential details like:
  • Asset ID or serial number
  • Description
  • Location
  • Purchase date and cost
  • Manufacturer and model
  • Warranty details
5. Condition Assessment:
  • Visual Inspection: Most basic method where assets are visually examined for signs of wear, damage, or aging.
  • Functional Testing: Test the asset to ensure it’s operating as intended.
  • Use of Technological Devices: Tools like vibration analyzers for machinery, infrared cameras to check for electrical issues, or sonar-based tools for inspecting pipelines.
  • Expert Evaluation: Bring in specialists to evaluate complex assets or those requiring specialized knowledge.
6. Rate the Condition:
  • Create a rating system, commonly on a scale from 1-5 or 1-10. For example:
  • 1: Critical condition, immediate attention required
  • 5: Excellent condition, no action needed
  • Ensure that the criteria for each rating level are clearly defined and consistently applied.
7. Record Other Relevant Information:
  • Expected lifespan of the asset.
  • Historical maintenance records.
  • Any past issues or failures.
8. Update Regularly:
  • Assets degrade over time, new assets are acquired, and old ones are retired. It’s essential to update the inventory and condition assessment periodically.
  • How often you should update depends on the asset type and its significance. Critical assets might require annual assessments, while others might be reviewed every 2-5 years.
9. Analyze and Use the Data:
  • Use the inventory and condition data to forecast maintenance needs, budget for replacements, and determine if any assets can be retired or sold.
  • Understand the total cost of ownership for each asset, which includes acquisition, maintenance, operational, and disposal costs.
10. Store Data Securely:
  • Ensure that asset data is stored securely, backed up regularly, and is accessible to those who need it. Specialized asset management software often comes with robust data security features.
11. Train and Educate Staff:
  • Ensure that everyone involved understands the importance of accurate inventory and assessment and knows how to use the tools and systems in place.

By systematically inventorying and assessing the condition of assets, organizations can ensure they get the maximum value from their assets, reduce unplanned downtimes, and make informed budgeting and investment decisions.

Levels of Service

The concept of “Levels of Service” (LoS) is commonly used in the fields of infrastructure management, public services, and customer service. In essence, it defines the standards or benchmarks used to measure the performance of a system or service. Here’s an in-depth look into the concept:

Definition: Levels of Service (LoS) describe the quality or standard of service that users can expect under normal conditions. It often encompasses both qualitative and quantitative measures.

Purpose of LoS:

  • Setting Clear Expectations: It defines what the service provider aims to deliver and what users can expect. This minimizes misunderstandings and aligns expectations.
  • Performance Measurement: By establishing standards, organizations can measure performance against these benchmarks.
  • Decision-Making: Knowing the desired LoS helps in making informed decisions, especially regarding budget allocation, resource management, and prioritization.
  • Continuous Improvement: Identifying gaps between desired and actual LoS can lead to improvement initiatives.

Components of Levels of Service:

  • Customer Levels of Service: This is from the user’s perspective. It revolves around what the user receives or perceives. For example, in a water supply service, a customer LoS might be “water is available 99% of the time.”
  • Technical Levels of Service: This is from the service provider’s perspective. It involves more technical measures. For the water supply example, a technical LoS might involve specific pressure measures or water quality parameters.

Examples in Various Sectors:

  • Infrastructure & Utilities: For roads, a LoS might involve measures like road smoothness, traffic congestion levels, or time taken to repair potholes.
  • Healthcare: In a hospital, LoS could pertain to waiting times, patient satisfaction scores, or bed availability.
  • Telecommunications: For internet providers, LoS might involve uptime, speed, and customer service response times.

Establishing Levels of Service:

  • Stakeholder Consultation: Engaging with users and stakeholders to understand their expectations.
  • Benchmarking: Comparing with similar service providers or industry standards.
  • Balancing Expectations and Resources: While everyone might want the highest LoS, there are always constraints in terms of resources, budget, and technical feasibility. Hence, a balance is struck between what’s desired and what’s practical.
  • Regular Reviews: As user expectations, technological capabilities, and external conditions change, LoS definitions might need revisions.

Challenges:

  • Subjectivity: Especially with qualitative measures, there can be subjectivity in interpreting LoS.
  • Changing Expectations: In today’s rapidly evolving world, user expectations can change quickly, making it challenging for service providers to keep up.
  • Resource Constraints: Achieving higher levels of service often requires more resources, which might not always be feasible.

In conclusion, Levels of Service is a vital concept for both service providers and users. It provides clarity, aids in decision-making, and helps in ensuring that services meet or exceed user expectations.

Impact of levels of funding on Level of Service

The amount of funding allocated to a particular service or infrastructure greatly influences the quality and extent of the service provided. Here’s how levels of funding can impact Levels of Service:

  • Direct Impact on Quality: Adequate funding ensures that essential resources, such as skilled manpower, quality materials, and state-of-the-art technology, are available. This enhances the overall quality of the service. Conversely, reduced funding might result in compromises, affecting service quality.
  • Maintenance and Upgrades: Regular maintenance is crucial for sustaining the desired LoS. Without sufficient funding, maintenance activities might be deferred, leading to degradation of assets and a decrease in the service quality. Additionally, funding is required for timely upgrades to meet changing demands and standards.
  • Expansion of Service: If there’s a growing demand, adequate funding is needed to expand the service to cater to more users. Insufficient funding can hinder expansion, leading to service constraints and dissatisfaction among users.
  • Emergency Preparedness: Adequate funding ensures that there are contingency plans and resources in place to deal with emergencies without compromising the LoS. This is particularly important for critical services like water supply, electricity, and healthcare.
  • Innovation and Efficiency: Investment in research and development, facilitated by sufficient funding, can lead to innovative solutions that enhance LoS. Such solutions might offer better results with the same or even reduced costs in the long run.
  • Staffing and Training: The quality of service is often directly related to the skills and motivation of the staff. Adequate funding allows for hiring qualified staff, providing them with training, and offering competitive remuneration, which can enhance the LoS.
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Engaging with users and stakeholders to understand their expectations and feedback requires resources. Adequate funding ensures that there’s a mechanism for continuous feedback, leading to improvements in the LoS.
  • Reduced Lifespan of Assets: Insufficient funding can lead to the premature aging of assets, as maintenance and replacements are deferred. This can result in more frequent breakdowns and reduced LoS.
  • Economic Impacts: When LoS declines due to insufficient funding, there can be broader economic impacts. For instance, poor road infrastructure can hamper trade and commerce, and inadequate healthcare services can result in a less productive workforce.
  • Public Perception and Trust: Consistently high Levels of Service foster trust in the service provider, be it a government agency or a private entity. Inadequate funding, leading to reduced LoS, can erode this trust, making it harder for service providers to operate efficiently or gain support for future initiatives.

In conclusion, funding plays a pivotal role in determining the Level of Service. While innovative solutions and efficiencies can bridge the gap to some extent, sustained underfunding will almost inevitably lead to a decline in the quality and breadth of services provided.

Journal Question:  

Using the forum labelled “Course 8: Chapter 3” make a journal entry responding to the prompt below. Ensure that you title the entry “Lesson 3”. After writing a journal entry, go and make a comment on two other posts from your classmates. It can be about anything you noticed, liked, agreed with etc. The idea is to continue the dialogue about the topic.

 

Prompt: What strategies can be employed to enhance resilience and emergency preparedness, especially in light of global disruptions like climate events or pandemics?

 

*View the journal entry and journal comment rubric to see how they will be marked

Criteria

Exemplary
4

Accomplished
3

Developing
2

Beginning
1

Purpose

Strong voice and tone that clearly addresses the purpose for writing.

Appropriate voice and tone. The purpose is largely clear.

Attempts to use personal voice and tone. Somewhat addresses the intended purpose.

Demonstrates limited awareness of use of voice and tone. Limited evidence of intended purpose.

Understanding

Many interesting, specific facts and ideas are included.

Many facts and ideas are included.

Some facts and ideas are included.

Few facts and ideas are included.

Conventions

All grammar and spelling is correct.

Only one or two grammar and spelling errors.

A few grammar and spelling errors.

Many grammar and spelling errors.

Reply

Made two significant contributions to the online forum. Highly supportive of others.

Made one contribution to the online forum. Supported group members.

Attempted to contribute to online forum but was vague and unclear in the writing.

Minimally involved. Offered limited support to online group members.

 

Works Cited:

Christiansen, B. (2023, September 8). Asset inventory management: Tools and processes explained. Limble CMMS. https://limblecmms.com/blog/asset-inventory-management/

What are levels of service (LOS)?. Limble CMMS. (2023, September 26). https://limblecmms.com/maintenance-definitions/levels-of-service/

License

Indigenous Public Works and Housing Management Copyright © by Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technologies. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book