55
Lesson 6: Emergency Planning, Response, and Recovery in Public Works
Outcomes:
- Describe the role of Public Works in emergency planning, response, and recovery
- Discuss best practices in emergency management
- Develop and implement the public works portion of an emergency response plan
- Demonstrate proficient explanation of the Incident Command system
- Describe emerging trends in emergency management
Emergency Planning, Response, and Recovery in Public Works
Public works agencies are responsible for the protection and preservation of life, property, evidence, and the environment. They play a vital role in disaster prevention, preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery.
<image>
Public works agencies play a vital role in the community and are crucial for helping the community prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from disasters.
Response
When an incident occurs and the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is activated, public works representation is essential there as well. Public works professionals in the EOC will be able to coordinate efforts in the field as the agency works to:
- Assess damage
- Secure utilities and lifelines
- Open roads
- Manage environmental and safety hazards
- Manage resources
- Secure facilities
The top response priority for public works is preservation of life and public health, followed by public service needs such as those identified above as well as additional support functions
Recovery
Public works agencies take a lead role as the community begins to move from response into recovery. Priorities established in the preparedness and response phases are used for establishing recovery priorities, although they may change based on new developments and current information.
Restoration of lifelines is most often viewed as the first priority for the public works function. With the restoration of utilities, services, and other infrastructure, all agencies can better perform and the community begins to return to normality.
Other recovery activity for public works includes long-term debris management, coordination with State and Federal officials, documentation, inspection services, redevelopment, and facility reconstruction. In addition, Public Works may aid in activity such as re-entry, public health issues, and sheltering.
Core Capability – Planning
When emergency planning teams are established, public works representation is essential to ensure that all key planning elements are included. Preparedness includes a thorough evaluation of priorities specific to public works as well as the overall functions of the government agency as a whole. Without this evaluation, delayed response or recovery efforts will surely result.
Coordination among different agencies is essential to ensure a quick response and recovery and must be considered during the community’s planning efforts. It is important to build interagency relationships through regular training and exercise that includes public works as well as all other appropriate agencies.
Establishing partnerships early on will help to educate other agencies about the capabilities of public works so their services are called upon when needed. Unified training will support successful unified response.
The planning team should identify the potential need for mutual aid or contract services to support the public works effort. A mutual aid agreement or Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) should be put in place before a disaster strikes that can be activated quickly when there is a known approaching danger.
Emergency Management Best Practices
Prevention
To support prevention efforts in the community, public works agencies may perform tasks such as:
Installing fencing around critical facilities like water treatment plants or to limit access to dams
Installing surveillance cameras at facilities
Increasing public awareness of indicators of terrorism and terrorism-related crime around critical facilities; for example, through the “If You See Something, Say Something”™ public awareness program
Identifying possible terrorism targets and capabilities
Issuing time-sensitive alerts to the public, using all appropriate communication means and social media
Protection
To support protection efforts in the community, public works agencies may perform tasks such as:
- Making water rationing recommendations during drought conditions
- Closing flood-prone roads that are predicted to be inundated during heavy rains or snowmelt
- Frequent testing and maintenance of equipment and facilities to ensure functionality during an emergency
- Removal of trees and shrubs from levees to maintain structural integrity
- Removal of plants and other potential fire fuels around public facilities where fire hazards are high
- Immunizations for public works employees during flu season
Mitigation
All communities should have a standing mitigation committee, and the public works professional should have a permanent place at the table. When mitigation priorities are identified, they will likely fall heavily in the public works arena. Countless possibilities for mitigation exist when considering infrastructure improvements alone.
For this reason, the public works agency is often the architect of a disaster-resistant community, and identifying mitigation opportunities is a continuous process for public works professionals. When mitigation funds become available, they are often allocated for projects that will improve public infrastructure and facilities because these components are essential for protecting the health and safety of the community’s citizens.
Benefits of Mitigation
- Reduction of risk
- Improved response efficiency
- Fewer recovery needs
- Reduced loss of life and property
- Better management of resources
- Improved public awareness
Public Works Emergency Response Plan
The Provincial Emergency Management Plan (PEMP), authorized by The Emergency Planning Act, sets a broad structure for the government to prepare for and tackle emergencies that need a combined provincial approach.
This plan details how the Saskatchewan Government organizes its emergency response and offers direction to its departments, Crowns, and affiliated bodies. It clarifies their duties during an emergency and how they collaborate with local Saskatchewan government bodies and Emergency Operation Centers.
Under The Emergency Planning Act, local entities are mandated to have their own emergency response strategies. Unless a provincial emergency is declared, these local plans remain in effect. When the emergency system is activated, the provincial and local plans function together, with local strategies directing city actions and the provincial plan overseeing the collective governmental response. It’s suggested, though not mandatory, for local areas to use the ICS system, like Saskatchewan’s government, to unify response actions.
It’s worth noting that across Canada, other provinces and territories may have their own emergency management frameworks and regulations. Each region’s unique geography, risks, and administrative structure can lead to variations in their emergency response plans. While some might mirror Saskatchewan’s approach, others might have different systems or prioritizations in place, depending on their specific needs and experiences.
Incident Command System
The Incident Command System (ICS) is a standardized management system to organize and manage a scalable response to any emergency incidents.
Key Features of ICS:
Standardized Structure: Regardless of the scale or type of incident, the ICS structure remains consistent. This standardization helps reduce confusion, especially when multiple organizations are involved.
- Modularity: The ICS can be scaled up or down, depending on the needs of the incident. It can handle anything from a minor incident handled by a single responder to massive, multi-agency responses.
- Unified Command: When multiple agencies are involved, the ICS facilitates a unified command structure. This ensures all agencies have input and that there’s a single, coordinated strategy for the incident.
- Clear Communication: ICS provides a common language and set protocols, ensuring everyone involved in the response understands their roles, responsibilities, and the information being shared.
- Integrated Planning: The ICS process integrates various agencies’ operational plans into a single, cohesive incident action plan.
Examples of ICS in Action:
- Wildfires: For large wildfires, multiple agencies, including local fire departments, state agencies, and federal teams, might be involved. ICS ensures everyone has a clear role, whether it’s battling the flames, evacuating residents, or providing emergency medical aid.
- Major Accidents: In the case of a significant train derailment or highway pile-up, various entities like local police, fire, state agencies, and perhaps even federal resources might be mobilized. ICS allows for a coordinated and effective response, ensuring, for example, that hazardous materials are managed safely while injured parties receive medical attention.
- Public Events: For large-scale events, like marathons or parades, where the potential for incidents exists, ICS can be employed pre-emptively. Different agencies will have predefined roles, such as crowd control, medical response, or traffic management.
- Natural Disasters: In events like hurricanes or earthquakes, multiple organizations and agencies will respond. With ICS, their efforts are coordinated so that areas in most need get the right resources, shelters are established, and medical aid is distributed efficiently.
By integrating different organizations into a cohesive, responsive unit, the Incident Command System plays a critical role in managing emergencies effectively, ensuring resources are used optimally, and, most importantly, saving lives.
Journal Question:
Using the forum labelled “Course 4: Chapter 1” make a journal entry responding to the prompt below. Ensure that you title the entry “Lesson 1”. After writing a journal entry, go and make a comment on two other posts from your classmates. It can be about anything you noticed, liked, agreed with etc. The idea is to continue the dialogue about the topic.
Prompt: Discuss the benefits of mitigation as listed. Can you think of real-world examples where mitigation has saved lives or property?
*View the journal entry and journal comment rubric to see how they will be marked
Criteria |
Exemplary (4)
|
Accomplished (3)
|
Developing (2)
|
Beginning (1)
|
Purpose |
Strong voice and tone that clearly addresses the purpose for writing.
|
Appropriate voice and tone. The purpose is largely clear.
|
Attempts to use personal voice and tone. Somewhat addresses the intended purpose.
|
Demonstrates limited awareness of use of voice and tone. Limited evidence of intended purpose.
|
Understanding |
Many interesting, specific facts and ideas are included.
|
Many facts and ideas are included.
|
Some facts and ideas are included.
|
Few facts and ideas are included.
|
Conventions |
All grammar and spelling is correct.
|
Only one or two grammar and spelling errors.
|
A few grammar and spelling errors.
|
Many grammar and spelling errors.
|
Reply |
Made two significant contributions to the online forum. Highly supportive of others.
|
Made one contribution to the online forum. Supported group members.
|
Attempted to contribute to online forum but was vague and unclear in the writing.
|
Minimally involved. Offered limited support to online group members.
|
Works Cited:
Incident command system courses. Alberta.ca. (n.d.). https://www.alberta.ca/incident-command-system-courses.aspx