83

Lesson 5

Preparing a Financial Report

Preparing a financial report involves a systematic process that encompasses various stages, including decision-making, planning, and monitoring. The goal is to ensure that the financial report is accurate, compliant, and provides valuable insights into the financial health and performance of an entity, be it an individual, a business, or any other organization.

1. Decision-Making:

1. Define the Purpose: Understand why you’re preparing the financial report. Is it for internal use, for shareholders, or regulatory requirements?
2. Determine the Reporting Period: Decide whether the report will be monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual.
3. Select the Appropriate Financial Statements: This typically includes the Income Statement, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow Statement, and Statement of Equity. The selection may vary based on the entity’s nature and the report’s purpose.

2. Planning:

1. Gather Data: Collect all necessary financial data, including receipts, invoices, bank statements, and previous financial reports.
2. Set a Timeline: Determine when each step of the reporting process should be completed to ensure the report is ready by the due date.
3. Choose a Reporting Standard: Depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the entity, choose the appropriate financial reporting standard, such as GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) or IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards).

3. Compilation and Analysis:

1. Record Transactions: Ensure all financial transactions during the period are recorded accurately using the chosen accounting method (either cash or accrual).
2. Analyze Data: Review financial data to identify trends, anomalies, or areas of concern. This analysis will aid in making informed business decisions and might influence the content of the financial report’s notes or management’s discussion.
3. Adjustments: Make any necessary adjusting entries for items like depreciation, prepaid expenses, or accrued liabilities.

4. Drafting the Report:

1. Prepare Financial Statements: Using the compiled and analyzed data, draft the primary financial statements.
2. Add Notes to Financial Statements: These provide additional details or context about the financial data, such as the accounting methods used, details about long-term debt, or potential liabilities.
3. Management’s Discussion & Analysis (MD&A): For some entities, especially publicly-traded companies, the report might include an MD&A section where management discusses the financial results, trends, risks, and future outlook.

5. Review and Monitoring:

1. Internal Review: Before finalizing, have the financial report reviewed by internal teams, such as management or an internal audit team, to ensure accuracy and completeness.
2. External Audit (if applicable): Larger entities, especially publicly-traded ones, often require an external audit. An independent auditor will review the financial report and provide an opinion on its accuracy.
3. Monitor Feedback: After the report is published, monitor feedback from stakeholders. This can provide insights into areas of improvement for future reports.

6. Presentation and Distribution:

1. Finalize the Report: Incorporate any changes from the review process.
2. Distribute: Share the report with intended stakeholders, which might include internal teams, shareholders, regulatory bodies, or the general public.
3. Archive: Store the report and all supporting documentation securely for future reference, ensuring adherence to record retention policies.

In conclusion, preparing a financial report is not just a mechanical process of listing numbers. It involves making informed decisions, careful planning, rigorous monitoring, and constant feedback to ensure that the report serves its intended purpose effectively and efficiently.

CAFR in Canada

The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) in Canada holds significant importance, and understanding its significance, creation process, and impact on various stakeholders is crucial:

Significance of CAFRs in Canada:

• Regulatory Compliance: In Canada, most governmental entities, including federal, provincial, and municipal governments, are mandated by law or regulations to produce an annual report on their financial position. The CAFR helps fulfill this legal obligation, ensuring that the entity adheres to the financial reporting standards set by regulatory bodies like the Public Sector Accounting Board (PSAB).
• Promotion of Financial Accountability: The process of preparing a CAFR in Canada requires governmental entities to systematically organize, assess, and document their financial activities. This promotes financial discipline, adherence to the Canadian Public Sector Accounting Standards (CPSAS), and transparency in financial reporting practices.

Process of Creating a CAFR in Canada:

• Data Collection: Throughout the fiscal year, financial transactions are recorded and documented by various departments within the governmental entity, ensuring compliance with the CPSAS.
• Internal Review: Before the end of the fiscal year, internal teams in Canadian governmental entities review preliminary financial data to ensure accuracy, completeness, and adherence to PSAB standards.
• External Audit: After the fiscal year concludes, an external accounting firm conducts audits of the financial records, ensuring alignment with PSAB standards. Their findings and opinions are then included in the CAFR.
• Preparation and Compilation: The finance department or relevant team compiles the audited financial data, statistical data, and supplementary information to create the draft CAFR, following the PSAB guidelines.
• Publication and Distribution: After internal approvals, the CAFR is published and distributed to relevant stakeholders in Canada. Many governmental entities also make their CAFRs available online to enhance transparency.

Impact on Stakeholders in Canada:

• Citizens: Canadian citizens are the primary stakeholders in any governmental entity. A CAFR provides them with insights into how their tax dollars are being spent, the debt obligations of their government, and the overall fiscal health of the entity, ensuring transparency and accountability.
• Elected and Appointed Officials: Canadian elected and appointed officials are responsible for making decisions on behalf of the governmental entity. The CAFR provides them with data-driven insights that can inform policy decisions, budgetary allocations, and strategic initiatives tailored to the needs of Canadians.
• Creditors and Bondholders: Those who lend money or invest in bonds issued by Canadian governmental entities rely on the CAFR to assess the entity’s ability to meet its financial obligations, providing confidence in financial stability.
• Rating Agencies: Canadian rating agencies and international agencies assess the creditworthiness of the governmental entity based on the CAFR. These ratings can influence interest rates on bonds and the overall cost of borrowing for public projects in Canada.
• Researchers and Analysts: Canadian researchers and analysts use CAFRs as primary source documents to study public finance trends, compare fiscal health across Canadian entities, and make policy recommendations tailored to the Canadian financial landscape.

In summary, the CAFR in Canada is a critical document in public finance, promoting transparency, facilitating decision-making, and serving as a tool for accountability. Its effectiveness relies on accuracy, timely publication, and accessibility to Canadians and stakeholders who need the information to ensure responsible financial governance in the country.

ISC

Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) is a department of the Government of Canada that primarily serves to improve access to high-quality services for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis. “Indigenous Services Canada (ISC) works collaboratively with partners to improve access to high quality services for First Nations, Inuit and Métis. Our vision is to support and empower Indigenous peoples to independently deliver services and address the socio-economic conditions in their communities.” Like other federal government departments, ISC has to maintain a robust internal control system, especially over financial reporting (ICFR), to ensure reliability, accuracy, and transparency.

Internal Control Management:

• Framework Implementation: Many departments adopt recognized control frameworks, such as the COSO Internal Control Framework, to design and evaluate their internal controls.
• Role Clarity: Designating clear roles and responsibilities at all levels helps in ensuring tasks related to financial reporting are understood and performed correctly.
• Continuous Training: Regular training sessions are often organized to keep the staff updated about control procedures, policies, and best practices.

Risk Assessment:

• Identifying Risks: Departments usually identify potential risks that could threaten the accuracy and reliability of financial reporting.
• Risk Prioritization: Not all risks have the same impact or likelihood. Departments prioritize risks to ensure that critical threats are addressed first.
• Control Activities: For identified risks, control activities (such as reconciliations, reviews, and approvals) are designed and implemented to mitigate or manage them.

Monitoring and Reviews:

• Regular Audits: Internal audit teams, or sometimes third-party auditors, conduct regular audits to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of internal controls.
• Control Self-Assessments: These are often used by management to evaluate the performance and design of existing controls.
• Feedback Mechanism: Mechanisms for feedback from staff and other stakeholders help in identifying control weaknesses or areas of improvement.

Information & Communication:

• Transparent Reporting: Any findings, changes, or updates related to internal controls are communicated transparently to all relevant stakeholders.
• Technology Integration: Advanced systems and software are often employed to automate and enhance the ICFR process, ensuring real-time data integrity and validation.

Action Plans and Remediation:

• Addressing Weaknesses: Any identified control weaknesses or deficiencies lead to the formulation of action plans to rectify them.
• Follow-up Reviews: After action plans are implemented, follow-up reviews ensure that control weaknesses have been appropriately addressed.
• Continuous Improvement: Based on the assessment results, changes are made to the ICFR system to adapt to new challenges, risks, or environmental shifts.

First Nations Transparency Act

The First Nations Financial Transparency Act (FNFTA) was a piece of Canadian federal legislation that came into effect on March 27, 2013. It primarily sought to increase financial transparency and accountability for First Nations bands across Canada. Here’s an overview of the act and its implications:

Key Provisions:

Annual Audited Financial Statements: The FNFTA requires all First Nations bands to produce annual audited financial statements, which includes:

• A statement of revenue, expenditure, changes in net debt, and a cash flow statement.
• Schedules of remuneration and expenses, particularly focusing on salaries and benefits of chief and council members.
• The auditor’s written report on the financial statements.

Publication of Financial Information: First Nations are required to publish these financial statements and schedules both on their own website (if available) and on the website of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC, now split into Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) and Indigenous Services Canada (ISC)).

Access to Information: The act makes it a right for First Nations members to access the aforementioned financial statements and schedules of their band. This was aimed at enhancing transparency within First Nations communities.

Criticisms and Controversy:

The FNFTA generated significant debate and controversy, with positions both in favor of and against it:

• Support: Proponents of the act believed that it would enhance transparency, allow band members to see how funds were being used by leadership, and ultimately ensure that federal funds were being used efficiently for community development.
• Opposition: Detractors argued that the act was a paternalistic measure, imposing standards on First Nations that were not necessarily applied to other governments. They felt it infringed upon the sovereignty and self-governance of First Nations. Moreover, there were concerns that the published data could be misinterpreted or taken out of context, especially regarding salaries and benefits of chiefs and councilors, leading to misconceptions about remuneration.

Subsequent Developments:

The Liberal Party of Canada, which came to power in the 2015 federal election, had committed to improving the nation-to-nation relationship with Indigenous Peoples. As a result, in December 2015, the new government announced that it would stop enforcing some of the punitive aspects of the FNFTA, particularly the provisions that withheld funds or took bands to court for non-compliance.

In the subsequent years, there have been ongoing discussions and initiatives to revisit policies related to First Nations financial transparency and accountability in a manner that respects Indigenous sovereignty and governance, while also ensuring that First Nations members have access to financial information about their communities.